[BFix] FW: The new Socialism!

Formerjughead at aol.com Formerjughead at aol.com
Sun Apr 27 14:47:26 MST 2008


I am still waiting for your explanation of using the My-Lai massacre as  
justification for armed insurrection and what the corollary is to the  American 
Revolution and the first two amendments of the Constitution. 
 
I can figure out how the 1st, 5 th and 8 th fit into  the argument ; however, 
the 2nd doesn't appear to be germane. 
 
 
In a message dated 4/27/2008 1:46:31 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
sfu at roadrunner.com writes:

This has  become a boring waste of time.  Your replies are continuing to  
deviate ever farther from the original discussion and have degenerated  
into pathetic attempts at belittlement and an argument over whether or  
not a word (that even the publishers of a dictionary recognize)  exists.  
I will let you return to your solo drinking and perusal of  the 
dictionary in search of those "big" words to insert in your  conversations.

Formerjughead at aol.com wrote:
>  
> I  admitted to missing the point you were making in the reference to 
>  "Mi-Lia" (My-Lai) so please enlighten me.
>  
> Just because  a word has been in use for 80 odd years doesn't mean that 
> it is  proper or generally accepted. Again you have glossed over the 
> facts  and extracted what you need to vindicate your point.
>  
> I  never said that the word didn't exist. The most frequently repeated 
>  remark, by usage commentators, is that it does not exist. The 
>  publishers of the "Mirriam- Webster Dictionary" go on to say that even  
> though the word does exist "it is far from general acceptance" and  the 
> word "regardless" should be used instead.
>  
>  You really don't spend much time reading anything more than news 
>  papers and magazines do you?
>  
> Quixotically  waiting
>  
> In a message dated 4/27/2008 11:50:25 A.M.  Pacific Daylight Time, 
> sfu at roadrunner.com  writes:
>
>     Proved my previous comment and then  some.   I see you found your
>     dictionary  again as well.  If you would have raised your head from
>   the
>     keyboard during your haste to  correct my spelling, you would have
>      felt
>     the breeze as the point passed by just over  your head.  I guess I
>     didn't
>   type it slow enough for you.
>
>     ""there is no such word." There is such a word..."    Spoken in true
>     double-speak fashion.  Your  given reference acknowledges that it has
>     been in  use for at least 80 years but it doesn't exist according
>   to you.
>
>
>     Steve  Urban
>     Semper Fi!
>      SCB#143
>     EBR#0692
>      CA4WDC#3576
>     NRA & CRPA Life  Member
>     29 Palms, CA
>      sfu at roadrunner.com
>
>     Formerjughead at aol.com  wrote:
>     > "My-Lia" rings no bells.  It does  look to be a dyslexic
>     bastardization
>   > of "My-Lai" though. If you are using that as an argument,  in
>     support
>     > of your  opinion, then you realize that Lt. William Calley was
>   > convicted of ordering the murder of 128 persons and  was
>     sentenced to
>     >  life in prison. The sentence was later re-adjusted so that
>   Calley only
>     > served 4 1/2 months  in Leavenworth. The other 26 people, in
>      Calley's
>     > chain of command or otherwise  associated with the massacre, were
>     > either  found not guilty or acquitted.
>     > 
>   > Calley's sentence was reduced, on appeal, because he felt  that
>     he was
>     >  following the intent of the orders given to him by his Company
>   > Commander Capt. Ernest Medina.
>      > 
>     > So maybe you are going to tell me about  how the excuse of "Just
>     > following orders" does  not excuse someone from committing war
>      crimes.
>     > The precedent that was set forth at  the Nuremberg and Tokyo War
>     Crimes
>   > Tribunals.
>     > 
>   > So I guess I don't see the logic or I don't know what you  are
>     talking
>     >  about.
>     > 
>     > The  transcripts of the Calley Court Martial are available
>   through the
>     > Freedom of  Information Act and can be viewed in the electronic
>      reading
>     > room of the FBI's web  site.
>     > 
>     >  ps.
>     > 
>     > *Main  Entry:* ir·re·gard·less
>     > *Function:*  /adverb/
>     > *Pronunciation:*  "ir-i-'gärd-l&s
>     > *Etymology:* probably  blend of /irrespective /and /regardless/
>     > *:*  *REGARDLESS * <javascript:lookWord('regardless');>
>   > *usage */Irregardless /originated in dialectal American  speech
>     in the
>     > early  20th century. Its fairly widespread use in speech called
>   it to
>     > the attention of usage  commentators as early as 1927. The most
>     >  frequently repeated remark about it is that "there is no such
>   word."
>     > There is such a word,  however. It is still used primarily in
>      speech,
>     > although it can be found from time to  time in edited prose. Its
>     > reputation has not  risen over the years, and it is still a long way
>      > from general acceptance. Use /regardless /instead.
>   >
>     > Just because you can say it  and write it doesn't make it a word.
>     >  
>     > Brad
>     >  
>     > 
>     >  
>     > In a message dated 4/26/2008 6:41:09 P.M.  Pacific Daylight Time,
>     > sfu at roadrunner.com  writes:
>     >
>     >   Yes I am aware of "saluting-the-rank-not-the-man" but I  am
>     also aware
>     >   that the rank doesn't protect the man if he fails to live  up
>     to it 
>     >   My-Lia ring any bells?  As I stated before you would  have
>     made a very
>      >     nice Tory lap dog and there really isn't much point to  this
>     anymore
>     >   since you seem to be able to carry on both sides of the  argument
>     >     irregardless of my  actual input.
>     >
>      >     Good night, and good luck.
>      >
>     >     Steve  Urban
>     >
>      >
>     >
>      >
>     >
>      
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>   > Need a new ride? Check out the largest site for U.S. used  car
>     listings
>     > at AOL  Autos  <http://autos.aol.com/used?NCID=aolcmp00300000002851>.
>
>   _______________________________________________
>   bfix mailing list
>      bfix at broncofix.com
>      http://broncofix.com/mailman/listinfo/bfix
>
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  Need a new ride? Check out the largest site for U.S. used car listings  
> at AOL Autos  <http://autos.aol.com/used?NCID=aolcmp00300000002851>.

_______________________________________________
bfix  mailing  list
bfix at broncofix.com
http://broncofix.com/mailman/listinfo/bfix





**************Need a new ride? Check out the largest site for U.S. used car 
listings at AOL Autos.      
(http://autos.aol.com/used?NCID=aolcmp00300000002851)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.broncofix.com/pipermail/bfix/attachments/20080427/aca88b65/attachment.html


More information about the bfix mailing list