[BFix] FW: The new Socialism!
Laughner Bruce
legacy1 at windstream.net
Sun Apr 27 17:37:58 MST 2008
The good things just never seem to last :)
Bruce
----- Original Message -----
From: "Keith Forrest" <rkforrest at charter.net>
To: "Laughner Bruce" <legacy1 at windstream.net>
Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2008 7:30 PM
Subject: Re: [BFix] FW: The new Socialism!
> Too bad Michael and Latoya screwed it up for the rest of them.
>
> keith
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Laughner Bruce" <legacy1 at windstream.net>
> To: "bfix" <mail at broncofix.com>; "Keith Forrest" <rkforrest at charter.net>
> Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2008 7:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [BFix] FW: The new Socialism!
>
>
> >I was always more of a Tito fan !
> >
> > Bruce
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Keith Forrest
> > To: bfix at broncofix.com
> > Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2008 7:18 PM
> > Subject: Re: [BFix] FW: The new Socialism!
> >
> >
> > I ment the Jacksons.He He The German comment would be stealing Jackie
> > Gleasons line from Smokey and the Bandit.He He
> >
> > Keith
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Keith Forrest
> > To: bfix at broncofix.com
> > Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2008 6:46 PM
> > Subject: Re: [BFix] FW: The new Socialism!
> >
> >
> > Now you are bringing the Germans into this.When will it end.
> >
> > He He
> >
> > Keith
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Formerjughead at aol.com
> > To: sfu at roadrunner.com
> > Cc: mail at broncofix.com
> > Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2008 5:47 PM
> > Subject: Re: [BFix] FW: The new Socialism!
> >
> >
> > I am still waiting for your explanation of using the My-Lai
massacre
> > as justification for armed insurrection and what the corollary is to the
> > American Revolution and the first two amendments of the Constitution.
> >
> > I can figure out how the 1st, 5 th and 8 th fit into the argument ;
> > however, the 2nd doesn't appear to be germane.
> >
> > In a message dated 4/27/2008 1:46:31 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
> > sfu at roadrunner.com writes:
> > This has become a boring waste of time. Your replies are
> > continuing
> > to
> > deviate ever farther from the original discussion and have
> > degenerated
> > into pathetic attempts at belittlement and an argument over
whether
> > or
> > not a word (that even the publishers of a dictionary recognize)
> > exists.
> > I will let you return to your solo drinking and perusal of the
> > dictionary in search of those "big" words to insert in your
> > conversations.
> >
> > Formerjughead at aol.com wrote:
> > >
> > > I admitted to missing the point you were making in the
reference
> > to
> > > "Mi-Lia" (My-Lai) so please enlighten me.
> > >
> > > Just because a word has been in use for 80 odd years doesn't
mean
> > that
> > > it is proper or generally accepted. Again you have glossed over
> > the
> > > facts and extracted what you need to vindicate your point.
> > >
> > > I never said that the word didn't exist. The most frequently
> > repeated
> > > remark, by usage commentators, is that it does not exist. The
> > > publishers of the "Mirriam- Webster Dictionary" go on to say
that
> > even
> > > though the word does exist "it is far from general acceptance"
> > and
> > the
> > > word "regardless" should be used instead.
> > >
> > > You really don't spend much time reading anything more than
news
> > > papers and magazines do you?
> > >
> > > Quixotically waiting
> > >
> > > In a message dated 4/27/2008 11:50:25 A.M. Pacific Daylight
Time,
> > > sfu at roadrunner.com writes:
> > >
> > > Proved my previous comment and then some. I see you found
> > your
> > > dictionary again as well. If you would have raised your
head
> > from
> > > the
> > > keyboard during your haste to correct my spelling, you
would
> > have
> > > felt
> > > the breeze as the point passed by just over your head. I
> > guess I
> > > didn't
> > > type it slow enough for you.
> > >
> > > ""there is no such word." There is such a word..."
Spoken
> > in true
> > > double-speak fashion. Your given reference acknowledges
that
> > it has
> > > been in use for at least 80 years but it doesn't exist
> > according
> > > to you.
> > >
> > >
> > > Steve Urban
> > > Semper Fi!
> > > SCB#143
> > > EBR#0692
> > > CA4WDC#3576
> > > NRA & CRPA Life Member
> > > 29 Palms, CA
> > > sfu at roadrunner.com
> > >
> > > Formerjughead at aol.com wrote:
> > > > "My-Lia" rings no bells. It does look to be a dyslexic
> > > bastardization
> > > > of "My-Lai" though. If you are using that as an argument,
> > in
> > > support
> > > > of your opinion, then you realize that Lt. William Calley
> > was
> > > > convicted of ordering the murder of 128 persons and was
> > > sentenced to
> > > > life in prison. The sentence was later re-adjusted so
that
> > > Calley only
> > > > served 4 1/2 months in Leavenworth. The other 26 people,
in
> > > Calley's
> > > > chain of command or otherwise associated with the
massacre,
> > were
> > > > either found not guilty or acquitted.
> > > >
> > > > Calley's sentence was reduced, on appeal, because he felt
> > that
> > > he was
> > > > following the intent of the orders given to him by his
> > Company
> > > > Commander Capt. Ernest Medina.
> > > >
> > > > So maybe you are going to tell me about how the excuse of
> > "Just
> > > > following orders" does not excuse someone from committing
> > war
> > > crimes.
> > > > The precedent that was set forth at the Nuremberg and
Tokyo
> > War
> > > Crimes
> > > > Tribunals.
> > > >
> > > > So I guess I don't see the logic or I don't know what you
> > are
> > > talking
> > > > about.
> > > >
> > > > The transcripts of the Calley Court Martial are available
> > > through the
> > > > Freedom of Information Act and can be viewed in the
> > electronic
> > > reading
> > > > room of the FBI's web site.
> > > >
> > > > ps.
> > > >
> > > > *Main Entry:* ir·re·gard·less
> > > > *Function:* /adverb/
> > > > *Pronunciation:* "ir-i-'gärd-l&s
> > > > *Etymology:* probably blend of /irrespective /and
> > /regardless/
> > > > *:* *REGARDLESS * <javascript:lookWord('regardless');>
> > > > *usage */Irregardless /originated in dialectal American
> > speech
> > > in the
> > > > early 20th century. Its fairly widespread use in speech
> > called
> > > it to
> > > > the attention of usage commentators as early as 1927. The
> > most
> > > > frequently repeated remark about it is that "there is no
> > such
> > > word."
> > > > There is such a word, however. It is still used primarily
> > in
> > > speech,
> > > > although it can be found from time to time in edited
prose.
> > Its
> > > > reputation has not risen over the years, and it is still
a
> > long way
> > > > from general acceptance. Use /regardless /instead.
> > > >
> > > > Just because you can say it and write it doesn't make it
a
> > word.
> > > >
> > > > Brad
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > In a message dated 4/26/2008 6:41:09 P.M. Pacific
Daylight
> > Time,
> > > > sfu at roadrunner.com writes:
> > > >
> > > > Yes I am aware of "saluting-the-rank-not-the-man" but
I
> > am
> > > also aware
> > > > that the rank doesn't protect the man if he fails to
> > live up
> > > to it
> > > > My-Lia ring any bells? As I stated before you would
> > have
> > > made a very
> > > > nice Tory lap dog and there really isn't much point
to
> > this
> > > anymore
> > > > since you seem to be able to carry on both sides of
the
> > argument
> > > > irregardless of my actual input.
> > > >
> > > > Good night, and good luck.
> > > >
> > > > Steve Urban
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > Need a new ride? Check out the largest site for U.S. used
> > car
> > > listings
> > > > at AOL Autos
> > <http://autos.aol.com/used?NCID=aolcmp00300000002851>.
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > bfix mailing list
> > > bfix at broncofix.com
> > > http://broncofix.com/mailman/listinfo/bfix
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Need a new ride? Check out the largest site for U.S. used car
> > listings
> > > at AOL Autos
> > <http://autos.aol.com/used?NCID=aolcmp00300000002851>.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > bfix mailing list
> > bfix at broncofix.com
> > http://broncofix.com/mailman/listinfo/bfix
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Need a new ride? Check out the largest site for U.S. used car
> > listings
> > at AOL Autos.
> >
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > bfix mailing list
> > bfix at broncofix.com
> > http://broncofix.com/mailman/listinfo/bfix
> >
> >
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > bfix mailing list
> > bfix at broncofix.com
> > http://broncofix.com/mailman/listinfo/bfix
> >
> >
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> > --
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > bfix mailing list
> > bfix at broncofix.com
> > http://broncofix.com/mailman/listinfo/bfix
> >
> >
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> > --
> >
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG.
> > Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.5/1400 - Release Date:
> > 4/27/2008
> > 9:39 AM
> >
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.5/1400 - Release Date: 4/27/2008
9:39 AM
>
>
More information about the bfix
mailing list